Case 1
Diksha Sharma (14) believes her gender is stopping her from realising her dreams that of becoming a singer. The girl from Haryana was recently in Mumbai to audition for a reality show, but didn’t get selected.
She says she feels like an “outsider” in her girls’ school and wants to get a sex change as soon as she turns 18.
Dr Vijay Sharma, president of the Indian Association of Cosmetic Surgery, said, “Technically, a sex change operation does nothing, but offer aesthetic value”.
Ha Ha.
Case 2
Seated beside her ‘gharwala’ Rupa at a non-descript eatery at Khaparkheda on Thursday, Rupali (both names changed) narrated how their same-sex marriage, after Rupa had fled with her ‘bride’ in a scooty, had jolted their village.
To defy the prevalent definitions and roles tied to sex and gender, subverting one or either of them, will not – can not - go unnoticed in a country like India. Especially when the people at the helm of these affairs (err, die pun die!) are girls. Without complete awareness of either case’s psychological history, its advisable to refrain from commenting about the specific details of their choices. Nevertheless choices these are, and they need to be respected, which I doubt they will be. I wonder whether, in these two unrelated incidents, we are getting a glimpse of changing gender equations in India as well as how uncomfortable it still makes us to think or talk about it.
A country where sexual orientation in itself has been a cloistered subject, especially in the post colonial era, there seems to be a rising consciousness of how archaic designations granted to sex and gender are slowly collapsing. Urban coupling has, in the recent years, extended itself beyond the obviousness of heterogeneity and broadened its scope to include those relationships that are generally refused a legitimate status in our culture. In my own social circle, moderately middle class Bombay, I have frequently witnessed a more fluid sort of sexuality that has violently refused to be shaped into something rigid and formal. Everybody experiments in their youth, someone reiterates. Everybody is expected to, someone else supplements. No one can disagree with that but if these touted experiments have outlived their expected or prescribed timelines then there must be something more concrete underlining these choices. This is no more a trend or a fad but is indicative of times that are changing.
7 years ago, while attending school, we were all herded into ill defined compartments of male and female beings/behaviors, people who could only fall in love or harbor desire for members of the opposite sex. I find it ludicrous that a society can be so invested in hypocrisy that on one hand it can’t remove itself from classifying human beings outside of the shape and function of the genitalia and yet, on a whole new and perverse level, decry any form of sexual freedom. Technically, at that point in time, we weren’t suppose to want anything or anybody. Back then we also believed that woman on top and missionary were the only sexual positions possible. We were that young and that stupid. Fair to say that social myths disintegrate in their own time and slowly, with the phasing out of our individual shyness, we each came to understand the complexities of our own sexual preferences, desires; whatyouhave. To be openly gay was still very difficult not to mention damaging at times; the amount of taunting and teasing it invoked from the average trolls was hideous. It was a quandary so frightful that many would have preferred nunnery or priesthood than to actually deal with the “plight” of being blessed with a sexual orientation that stood at odds with what was being prescribed by the society at large. But the young ‘uns persevered. Thats the advantage of youth: you feel the need to strongly preserve what you believe in, no matter how irrational the world might consider it to be. Yet, the predicament was about utter subjugation in the end. About one group of people, a larger more visible group, dictating how another group of people should live. There was no question of straight or.. It was always Straight. Period. To render yourself to the other side of the fence wasn’t quite an alternative since, you see, there was no other side of the fence. This was the whole playing field and its borders were closed; the fence was meant to eletrocute. You risked death, literal at times and figurative at others, if you dared to openly cross the turf.
Yet, people did. Friends came out to each other over the 5th round of tequila shots or failed suicide attempts. The reality of who you are, under your skin, is not really negotiable. Who you are is who you will become. You can’t unravel for decades just for the sake of appeasing a society that possibly wouldn’t give a toss about you when you sliced your veins or threw yourself from a high rise because you couldn’t take the suffocating closet anymore. And, those wrist cutting incidents did occur. We went to funerals with heavy hearts and angry fists knowing fully well that something could have been done to prevent this utter waste of bright lives.
If choosing to be gay or bi was this difficult then, the situation facing those who believed that they were born in the wrong body, those wanted out of their biological gender, was even more thorny. There were times when you could hear the occasional giggle as we discussed Ardh Nareshwar, in a philosophy class no less, while juxtaposing the dilemma faced by transgendered friends. The nature of humankind is such that, what it reveres from a distance, it somehow almost always denigrates up close. The possibility of gender reassignment surgery in India was incredibly bleak till even 5 years ago. To be transsexual equated to begging at traffic signals and weddings or childbirths. To so much as imagine for people to understand the difference between an hermaphrodite, a transsexual and a trans-gendered person was almost silly. I watched, with utter dismay and freezing horror, a documentary on the hijras of Bombay. A tradition amongst the older members of the community was to pelt their dead with stones and slippers, so that the person wouldn’t come back to such a “disguting” life and destiny ever again. It was radical. Negatively, of course. I coiled with shame and fear. We allowed for such absurdities to promulgate while declaring our superior nuclear strength to the world.
Any country, civilization, community is living only as well as the most decimated members that compose its continuum. Sexual minorities in India weren’t living well, I deduced. They still aren’t. My friends were packed off to faraway Universities once they came out to their folks. This was the better off end of the scale, what became of those who weren’t born to privilege and the culture of support groups? How did they reconcile what was theirs to know and feel in the face all that the world was enforcing on them? It made me uncomfortable to imagine the lives of those who had to live this obligatory schizophrenia. The blackballing was dual – familial as well as societal. Mothers couldn’t, still can’t or at least choose not to, understand why their sons and daughters would choose to love others of their own gender. A wide array of possible reasons for such a “disease” was arbitrated. From divine curses to a genetic discrepancy to psychological fallacies. Quacks and shrinks were summoned to fabricate potential cures. If that didn’t suffice, then there was always the wise option of tying the knot and praying the problem away.
In the years that passed by, a tiny mutiny surfaced, and it was time enough for it, to finally proclaim that Enough is Enough. This is my body, my soul, my heart – I will give it to whomever I want. We were few in numbers but vocal enough. There wasn’t any support coming to us from outside so it we looked for our own sustenance. We weren’t seeking approval for our way of life. We were declaring that we were going to live it one way or another: whether you consider it okay or not is really your problem. And you need to deal with it on your own time. More voices were added to this cluster. More faces started to figure at meets. More feet were willing to walk in marches. More minds were deconstructing that which was deemed “unnatural” and that, which was venerated as “natural”.
We, the rebellious mutants, have freed ourselves from the tyranny of imposed sexuality. I know that there is a wide gap between now and the time when same sex parents and gender queer friends could share the stage with other relations at civic receptions and marriage ceremonies of my friends. I also know that no one will tell my friends that its okay for them to continue to be honest to themselves and the world at large when they come out. Only a month ago I was embroiled in an unpleasant discussion with a well educated, psychology major no less, woman about town, who callously proclaimed that anything that was wasn’t straight was abnormal. I was horrified by the prospect of someone, who could possibly end up practicing clinical psychology, being so deeply prejudiced in her view of the world and its people.
My LGBT friends are not safe in this country, I have realized that. Niether am I, a self proclaimed heterosexual with androgynous inclinations, for volunteering my time and energy to the cause. They have been persecuted and it continues till this date. They have been objects of ridicule and even undermined as a “non issue”. The question of sexual orientation/identity based discrimination is not considered significant enough, it doesn’t invoke the same keenness that race or religion does. I say, if you choose to bully me for being a Dalit/Muslim/Jewish/Indian/Hindu/Tamil/Latin whateveritis, it is equal to you bullying me for being gay/bi/trans. Segregation while dealing with discriminatory attitudes is a harmful practice. Every minority, on some level, is representative of another minority. This, despite my cynicism for generalizations, has manifested itself as an obvious truth many a times. Even history has taught us this lesson. How many trains will we watch, go by, while we walk in insulating silence?
There are flaws in every relationship. Even in the stories above. Whether it is Rupa beating Rupali as an assertion of her “husband-ship”/ assumed masculinity and hence superiority to her wife, or Diksha’s belief that her loss in the competition has something to do with her gender; her being a boy could have guranateed a win. They are young. They need education. They need support.
My generation is often advertized as young, confused and in a hurry/aimless. I admit that if one were to strictly go by chronological sequencing, then we are indeed young (25 is tethering on the brink of “old” actually) and despite that, we are in possession of pragmatic souls. We are vintage spirits - a close pal quipped. We are confused; I can partially agree to that too. Then again, life is all about being confused from time to time. To shape your identity, in tune with and apart from sexual orientation, you need to break every once in a while. I may not know what I want, yet, but I sure do know what I don’t. To live in its entirety, is to allow yourself the leeway to fly, crash, burn, reorganize. Return. Getting your heart broken will always feel awful. No matter who breaks it; a girl or a boy. Is it really necessary, then, to add to that woe by delineating that you, by the virtue of being a girl, shouldn’t have fallen for girl, or that you, by the virtue of being a boy, shouldn’t have loved a boy?
About being in hurry : can you really blame us for steering our ships at mach speed when the world around steeps further into choicest forms of dogmatism? Work needs to be done; if we don’t move quickly, we will never make amends, or construct a more tolerant humanity for the generations that comes after us.
Posted @ BrownGirlMatters
The end of civility debate November 12, 2008
Tags: crimes, Feminism, global comment
The Taslim Solangi essay is up at Global Comment.
As always, ignorance amazes me.
Too busy/sapped/disengaged/tired/distracted to write much for the next two weeks.
Also, somehow this got published. And I didn’t even know about it.
Strange.